Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

A Conceptual Paper on Assessing the Competency of Primary Mathematics Teachers in Integrating Artificial Intelligence Tools into Teaching and Learning

K. Arivintthan Krishnan, Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i3/26246

Open access

Malaysian Mathematics education is evolving in line with global digital transformation, positioning artificial intelligence (AI) as an emerging technology with the potential to further enhance the teaching and learning process, which requires teacher’s competency for effective integration. However, existing literature indicates that no study has specifically explored primary Mathematics teacher’s competency in integrating AI into teaching and learning in the Malaysian context, highlighting the need for such research. Thus, this conceptual paper elaborates the conceptual framework for exploring the competency levels of primary school teachers in integrating AI tools into the teaching and learning of Mathematics, based on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model and the Malaysian Teacher Standards (SGM 2.0). This paper further analyses the issues, concepts, and objectives of the forthcoming study through a review of literature from various disciplines. This study may serve as a reference and foundation for future large-scale and comprehensive research aimed at assessing and exploring the competency levels of Mathematics teachers at the national level.

Ab Aziz, N. F. & Maat, S. M. (2021). Kesediaan dan Efikasi Guru Matematik Sekolah Rendah dalam Pengintegrasian Teknologi Semasa Pandemik COVID-19. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(8), 93 - 108.
Alvarez, J. I. (2024). Evaluating the impact of AI–powered tutors MathGPT and Flexi 2.0 in enhancing calculus learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(2), 495-508.
Awang, L. A., Yusop, F. D., & Danaee, M. (2025). Current practices and future direction of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2).
Bagno, E., Dana-Picard, T., & Reches, S. (2024). ChatGPT in Teaching Linear Algebra: Strides Forward, Steps to Go. Open Education Studies, 6(1), 41-274.
Bahador, Z. B., Othman, N. B., & Saidon, M. K. B. (2017). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengintegrasian Teknologi Pengajaran Berdasarkan Model TPACK dalam Kalangan Guru Matematik. International Consortium of Education and Culture Research Studies, 1(2), 66-73.
Chai, C. S., Hwee, J. L. K., & Tsai, C. (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
Chan, K. W., Ali, F., Park, J., Sham, K. S. B., Tan, E. Y. T., Chong, F. W. C., Qian, K., & Sze, G. K. (2025). Automatic item generation in various STEM subjects using large language model prompting. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100344.
Chandrasegaran, G & Maat, S. M. (2023). Kompetensi Guru Matematik Dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Untuk Peningkatan Kefahaman Matematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 5(4), 23-32.
Chear, T. S. & Norman, H. (2024). Persepsi Guru Tentang Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dalam Pengajaran Guru Di Peringkat Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 17(2), 150-157.
Coti?, M., Doz, D., Jenko, M., & Žakelj, A. (2024). Mathematics education: What was it, what is it, and what will it be? International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3).
European Union. (2020). Digital education action plan 2021–2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
Geraniou, E., Jankvist, U. T., Elicer, R., Tamborg, A. L., & Misfeldt, M. (2024). Towards a definition of “mathematical digital competency for teaching”. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 625-637.
Hoon, A. W. C., & Ibrahim, R. (2024). Isu Dan Cadangan Terhadap Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran: Persepsi Guru. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 6, 800-815.
Huang, K. Y., Chien, W. C., Zhang, Y., Wang, S. W., & Wang, Q. (2024). A comparative study of technological pedagogical content knowledge between special education and general education in China. Technology, Pedagogy and Education.
Inoferio, H., Espartero, M., Asiri, M., Damin, M., & Chavez, J. (2024). Coping with math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted Learning. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(5).
Jafar, M. F., Amran, Z. A., Yaakob, M. F. M., Yusof, M. R., & Awang, H. (2020). Kesediaan Pembelajaran Dalam Talian Semasa Pandemik Covid 19. Seminar Darulaman 2020 Peringkat Kebangsaan (SEDAR’20).
Jalil, N. A. A., & Siew, N. M. (2023). Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogi Kandungan Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 8(50), 109-122.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (DSKP) Matematik Tahun 3 Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2023). Dasar Pendidikan Digital. Kyala Lumpur: Bahagian Sumber dan Teknologi Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2023). Kurikulum Persekolahan 2027.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2023). Laporan Awal Pencapaian Malaysia dalam Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2023). Standard Guru Malaysia 2.0 (SGM 2.0). Putrajaya: Bahagian Profesionalisme Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kholid, M. N., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Muhaimin, L. H., Juandi, D., Sujadi, I., Kuncoro, K. S., & Adnan, M. (2023). A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) inmathematics education: Future challenges foreducational practice and research. Cogent Education, 10.
Kiray, S.A., Celik, I., & Çolako?lu, M.H. (2018). TPACK Self-Efficacy Perceptions of Science Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Study. Education and Science, 43(195), 236-268.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Kuppusamy, Y. & Norman, H. (2021). Kemahiran Teknologi dan Kesediaan Melaksanakan Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan Dalam Talian Semasa Era Pandemik Dalam Kalangan Guru di Sekolah Rendah Tamil. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(1), 428-441.
Li, C., Xing, W., Song, Y., & Lyu, B. (2025). RICE AlgebraBot: Lessons learned from designing and developing responsible conversational AI using induction, concretization, and exemplification to support algebra learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8.
Lau, J. S. C. & Roslinda Rosli. (2020). Pengetahuan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi Guru Matematik Sekolah Rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(11), 71 – 84.
Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., & Blannin, J. (2024). A systematic review of TPACK research in primary mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal.
Li, M., & Nugraha, M. G. (2025). Validating a context-specific TPACK scale for primary mathematics education in China. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2).
Lim, G. F. C., Jalil, N. A., Hidup, D. S. A., & Omar, M. (2024). Pengintegrasian Teknologi dalam Pendidikan: Cabaran Guru. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 8(1).
Ling, L. L., Rahisin, H., Kee, C. A., & Hung, V. K. S. (2023). Persepsi Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Rendah terhadap Standard Guru Malaysia 2.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 13(02), 109-118.
Mahmud, A. M. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Tahap Pemahaman Guru Matematik Melaksanakan Pengajaran Atas Talian. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(1), 1-14.
Makhsin, M., Teoh, Y. P., & Ismail, N. H. (2022). Standard Guru Malaysia 2.0 Dalam Kemenjadian Jiwa Pendidik. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 7(46), 327-346.
Mat Adam, N., Raja Maamor Shah, R. N. F. A., & Adnan, M. (2022). Manfaat dan Cabaran Pengintegrasian Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik: Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik. Jurnal Pendidkan Bitara UPSI, 15(1), 41-49.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235-251.
Mohamad Sidek, M. S. & Mahmud, M. S. (2024). Kemahiran Digital: Analisis Tahap Kemudahgunaan dan Tahap Kebolehgunaan Guru Matematik Sekolah Kebangsaan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 9(7).
Morris, W., Holmes, L., & Choi, J. S. (2024). Automated Scoring of Constructed Response Items in Math Assessment Using Large Language Models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Nadmilail, A. I., Matore, M. E. E. M., & Maat, S. M. (2022). The Potential of Situational Judgment Test for Pre-service Teacher Selection. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, 71(4), 4377-4389.
OECD. (2024). OECD Economic Surveys: Malaysia 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Osman, M. R. B., & Maat, S.M.B. (2022). Efikasi Kendiri dan Sikap Guru Matematik terhadap Pengintegrasian Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(12).
Rani, N. U. A. M., Roslan, N. H., & Wahid, N. S. A. (2025). Kesediaan guru Bahasa Melayu dalam mengimplementasikan kecerdasan buatan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 15(1).
Ravendran, D. R. & Daud, M. Y. (2020). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Guru Matematik Sekolah Rendah Dalam Mengintegrasikan Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam PDPC. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 1(3), 24-33.
Rizos, I., Foykas, E., & Georgakopoulos, S. V. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4).
Rumbelow, M., & Coles, A. (2024). The Promise of AI Object-Recognition in Learning Mathematics: An Explorative Study of 6-Year-Old Children’s Interactions with Cuisenaire Rods and the Blockplay.ai. Educ. Sci, 14(591).
Saharuddin, M. H., Nasir, M. K. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). Exploring teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge in utilising artificial intelligence (AI) for teaching. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1).
Sampar, R. B. A., & Mohamed, S. (2023). Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogi Kandungan (TPACK) Guru Prasekolah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(6).
Sariff, S. B. M., & Hamid, A. H. B. A. (2024). Amalan Kepimpinan Transformasional Guru Besar dan Hubungannya dengan Kualiti Guru di Sekolah TS 25. Jurnal Pendidikan, 49(1), 41-52.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Torres-Peña, R. C., Peña-González, D., Chacuto-López, E., Ariza, E. A., & Vergara, D. (2024). Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1019.
Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 16017–16040.
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
UNESCO. (2023). Steering AI to Empower Teachers and Transform Teaching: International Forum on AI and Education (5-6 Disember 2022), Laporan Analitik. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Unit Perancang Ekonomi. (2021). Dasar Revolusi Perindustrian Keempat (4IR) Negara. Putrajaya: Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M., Alali, R., & Jarrah, A. (2023). ChatGPT: A Revolutionary Tool for Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7).
World Bank Group. (2025). World Development Indicators–Government expenditure on education. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS [4 April 2025]
Yakob, F., & Hong, L. L. (2022). Level of Competency of Graduates of the Special Science Campus Teacher Education Institute. Journal Civic and Social Studies, 6(2), 84-98.
Yunianto, W., Lavicza, Z., Kastner-Hauler, O., & Houghton, T. (2024). Investigating the use of ChatGPT to solve a GeoGebra based mathematics+computational thinking task in a geometry topic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1027-1052.
Zatti, E. A., & Kalinke, M. A. (2024). Genia platform: A proposal for using artificial intelligence and intuitive programming in the creation of Learning objects. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa. São Paulo (SP), 12(30), 1-23.
Zulkarnain, N. S., & Md Yunus, M. (2023). Primary teachers’ perspectives on using artificial intelligence technology in English as a Second Language teaching and learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 861–877.

Krishnan, K. A., & Nasri, N. M. (2025). A Conceptual Paper on Assessing the Competency of Primary Mathematics Teachers in Integrating Artificial Intelligence Tools into Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1860–1872.