ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
The engineering design process (EDP) represents a systematic and iterative methodology for addressing problems and developing effective solutions. In this regard, the current study explores both the prevailing trends and the challenges encountered in implementing EDP within classroom settings. A systematic literature review (SLR) was guided by the PRISMA protocols with data extracted and analyzed from 27 peer-reviewed publications from 2020 to 2025. Implementation efforts span various educational levels from early childhood to the high school students. Findings from the thematic analysis indicate that integrating EDP into STEM teaching and learning yields five key dimensions: (a) the development of 21st-century competencies, (b) enhanced student engagement and motivation particularly within STEM domains, (c) the implementation of scaffolded teaching approaches, (d) iterative problem-solving processes that explicitly incorporate learning from failure and (e) the contextualization of learning through authentic real-world scenarios, interdisciplinary connections, and inclusive educational environments. In addition, this SLR identified five principal barriers: (a) curriculum constraints, (b) insufficient teacher preparedness, (c) student engagement issues and motivation, (d) resource limitations and learning environment, and (e) task complexity and assessment difficulties. To address these issues, the review recommends that student interests be prioritized during implementation, professional development opportunities for teachers be expanded and continued empirical research on EDP be encouraged to further optimize pedagogical practices.
Ali, M., & Tse, A. W. C. (2023). Research trends and issues of engineering design process for STEM education in K-12: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(3), 695–727. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2794
Anggoro, F. K., Dubosarsky, M., & Kabourek, S. (2021). Developing an observation tool to measure preschool children’s problem-solving skills. Education Sciences, 11(12), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120779
Aranda, M. L., Lie, R., & Guzey, S. S. (2020). Productive thinking in middle school science students’ design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09498-5
Barajas-Salazar, B. E., Almeida, M., Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Viveros, M. (2025). Culturally relevant informal STEM learning for underserved students: Effects of repeated exposure to the engineering design process. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1534452
Baze, C., González-Howard, M., Sampson, V., et al. (2023). Understanding student use of epistemic criteria in engineering design contexts. Science Education, 107(4), 1033–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21795
Bunprom, S., Tupsai, J., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). Learning activities to promote the concept of engineering design process for Grade 10 students’ ideas about force and motion through predict-observe-explain (POE). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012081
Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2025). Technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry in K–12 classrooms: A systematic review of empirical studies. Science & Education, 34(6), 1731–1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00538-8
Dedetürk, A., & K?rm?z?gül, A. S. (2021). The effects of STEM activities on 6th grade students’ conceptual development of sound. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 21–37.
Duong, X. Q., Nguyen, N. H., Nguyen, M. T., & Thao-Do, T. P. (2022). Applying STEM engineering design process through designing and making of electrostatic painting equipment in two rural schools in Vietnam. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.31004
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
Ergül, N. R., & Çal??, S. (2021). Examination of high school students’ engineering design skills: Example of electromagnetism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.102
Fan, S.-C., Yu, K.-C., & Lin, K.-Y. (2020). A framework for implementing an engineering-focused STEM curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y
Gencer, A. S., Do?an, H., & Bilen, K. (2020). Developing biomimicry STEM activity by querying the relationship between structure and function in organisms. Turkish Journal of Education, 9(1), 64–105. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.643785
Gök, B., & Sürmeli, H. (2022). The effect of scientific toy design activities based on the engineering design process on secondary school students’ scientific creativity. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(3), 692–709. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.17987
Guzey, S. S., & Jung, J. Y. (2021). Productive thinking and science learning in design teams. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10057-x
Hafiz, N. R. M., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering design process in STEM education: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i5/5998
Hewitt, T., & Forcino, F. (2025). The influence of a STEM unit on the interest in and understanding of science and engineering between elementary school girls and boys. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00404-x
Hite, R., Spott, J., Johnson, L., & Sobehrad, L. (2020). STEM challenge: Two years of community-engaged engineering. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-12-2019-0080
Ioannou, M., Kaliampos, G., & Ravanis, K. (2024). Condensation and precipitation of water vapor: The emergence of a precursor model through the engineering design process. Education Sciences, 14(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070757
Kim, J. E., & Park, J. (2023). Elementary students’ management of conflicts in an engineering design process and its effects on their group interaction progress. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 26(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10060
Kocaman, B. (2022). Investigation of the effects of STEM activities on STEM attitude in gifted students. Apunt Univ, 13(1), 1–29.
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Lakose, C. (2015). The inclusion of engineering design into the high school biology curriculum (pp. 1–63) [Graduate Research Papers]. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/75
Martin, W. B., Yu, J., Wei, X., Vidiksis, R., Patten, K. K., & Riccio, A. (2020). Promoting science, technology, and engineering self-efficacy and knowledge for all with an autism inclusion maker program. Frontiers in Education, 5, 75. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00075
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2020). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55, 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
Ngo, V. T. (2024). Applying the engineering design process to teach the physics course for engineering students using the flipped classroom combined with an instructional design model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-07-2023-0095
McNair, S. A. M., & Hayward, S. J. (2023). How do engineers do that? An interactive introduction to the engineering design process for secondary age school pupils. Physics Education, 58(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/accef3
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., Li, M., Loder, T. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., Moher, D., Yepes-Nuñez, J. J., Urrútia, G., Romero-García, M., & Alonso-Fernandez, S. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 34, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Rubowo, M. R., Nindita, V., et al. (2025). Developing engaging STEAM-geometry activities: Fostering mathematical creativity through the engineering design process using Indonesian cuisine context. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p213-234
Precharattana, M., Sanium, S., Pongsanon, K., Ritthipravat, P., Chuechote, S., & Kusakunniran, W. (2023). Blended engineering design process learning activities for secondary school students during COVID-19 epidemic: Students’ learning activities and perception. Education Sciences, 13(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020159
Putra, M. J. A., Mahdum, Mukaromah, A. N., Natuna, D. A., Syaflita, D., & Suryana, D. (2023). Development of the engineering design process (EDP) on the ability to design prototypes to increase natural disaster mitigation for elementary schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(7), 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.7.1903
Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Lesmono, A. D., Kumano, Y., & Fadzil, H. B. M. (2023). Gender roles in engineering design process activity: A small group exploration through collaborative argumentation. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(1), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.1.28
Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Supeno, & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Exploring students’ critical thinking skills using the engineering design process in a physics classroom. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3
Radloff, J. D., Guzey, S., Eichinger, D., & Capobianco, B. M. (2019). Integrating engineering design in undergraduate biology using a life science design task. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 45–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26901367
Roberts, T., Maiorca, C., Jackson, C., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. (2022). Integrated STEM as problem-solving practices. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.2024721
Šafhalter, A., Glodež, S., Šorgo, A., & Virti?, M. (2020). Development of spatial thinking abilities in engineering 3D modeling course aimed at lower secondary students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09597-8
Simpson, A., Knox, P. N., & Yang, J. (2023). Children’s engineering identities-in-practice: An exploration of child–adult interactions in an out-of-school context. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(4), 1056–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20553
Syukri, M., Halim, L., Mohtar, L. E., & Soewarno, S. (2018). The impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’ science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297
Shaffril, H. A. M., Samah, A. A., & Kamarudin, S. (2021). Speaking of the devil: A systematic literature review on community preparedness for earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 108(3), 2393–2419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04797-4
Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
Snyder, H. (2023). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704
Sung, E., Han, J., & Kelley, T. R. (2025). Enhancing STEM attitudes of rural high school students through engineering design-based learning. Journal of Technology Education, 36(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v36i2.a.6
Thammaariyasakun, P., Napapongs, W., Tansakul, J., & Inkaew, C. (2025). Development of a virtual learning environment with the engineering design process to enhance students’ creative thinking skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2226
Thomason, D., & Hsu, P. L. (2024). The effect of a STEM integrated curriculum on design thinking dispositions in middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(1), 83–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09894-6
Tipmontiane, K., & Williams, P. J. (2021). The integration of the engineering design process in biology-related STEM activity: A review of Thai secondary education. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v2i1.35097
Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N. J., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). Synthesizing results from empirical research on engineering design process in science education: A systematic literature review. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1912. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9129
Xue, X., Ahmad, N. J., & Liu, X. (2023). The development and validation of an EDP-STEM module-taking heat transfer, mechanics, and buoyancy as examples. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 649–668. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.037
Zhou, N., Pereira, N., Chandrasegaran, S., George, T. T., Booth, J., & Ramani, K. (2021). Examining middle school students’ engineering design processes in a design workshop. Research in Science Education, 51, 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09893-x
Zhang, J., Yuan, G., & Bogouslavsky, M. (2020). Give student ideas a larger stage: Support cross-community interaction for knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(4), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09332-4
Rahim, R. A., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2025). Integrating the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in Stem Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review of Impacts and Challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1661–1679.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode