ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study explores the support systems available to pre-service teachers in Malaysia as they attempt to integrate technology into their teaching practices during their practicum. With the growing importance of digital literacy and technology in education, this research examines how the training provided by educational institutions, mentorship from schools, and government policies facilitate or limit the integration of technology. The study employs a qualitative approach, analyzing the experiences of 30 pre-service teachers and their perceptions of the support systems in place. The findings highlight the role of sustainable educational practices in technology integration, with a particular focus on the long-term impact of these support mechanisms in fostering effective teaching and learning environments. This paper aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 9 (Innovation and Infrastructure), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), demonstrating the importance of sustainable technology integration in teacher education. This study is motivated by the need to enhance pre-service teachers’ readiness for digital transformation in Malaysia, where gaps in infrastructure and training persist. By examining institutional training, school mentorship, and government initiatives, it provides evidence on how support systems shape sustainable technology integration and offers insights for SDG-aligned educational reforms.
Abiloye, A. (2025). Empowering pre-service teachers through digital literacy for inclusive education. Empowering Pre-Service Teachers to Enhance Inclusive Education Through Technology, 1.
Al-Hattami, H. M. (2025). Understanding how digital accounting education fosters innovation: The moderating roles of technological self-efficacy and digital literacy. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(1), 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101131
Amini, M., Ravindran, L., & Lee, K. F. (2024). Adapting Education Shifts in Malaysia After COVID-19: A Comprehensive Review of Flexible Assessments, Lifelong Learning Initiatives, and Diversified Learning Trajectories. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 1-14.
Azman, M. H., Md Zabit, M. N., Megat Khalis, P. Z., Shahuddin, S. A., Ahmad, M. F., & Zachariah, T. Z. (2024). Pengetahuan dan kemahiran teknologi guru pelatih abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 17, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol17.sp2.11.2024
Babchuk, W. A. (2019). Contemporary approaches to qualitative research: Andragogical strategies for teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference. New Prairie Press. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2019/papers/3
Bibi, S., & Aziz, S. (2024). Navigation of teaching practicum challenges: An emerging perspective of pre-service teachers. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.767
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Capua, R. D., Guzman, M. T. de, & Santiago, M. G. A. (2025). Research competency of teachers in the Department of Education-Alfonso Lista, Ifugao, Philippines. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e04326. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe04326
Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001
Ching, K. W., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2025). Understanding school teachers’ acceptance of AI in education: Insights from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 564–579.
Coleman, M. L., Ragan, M., & Dari, T. (2024). Intercoder reliability for use in qualitative research and evaluation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 57(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2024.2303715
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Promoting digital literacy and social equity in education: lessons from successful initiatives. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3), 687-696.
Jambangan, E., & Serrano, R. (2025). Leveraging technology for personalized learning in English language education: A scoping review. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6535311/v1
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gaševi?, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Kim, D., Ding, L., & Cho, T. (2025). Bridging theory and practice: The effects of experiential learning-based simulation training on technology integration competency among pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-19.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Liu, W. C. (2024). Preparing teachers for the changing future (2014–2018). Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 23(3), 381-394.
Masfuah, S., Fakhriyah, F., Hilyana, F. S., & Kiong, T. T. (2024). The effect of technological pedagogy knowledge and technological content knowledge on TPACK of primary prospective teachers. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(10), 2024188. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024188
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2024). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia
Ministry of Education. (MOE). (2023). Basic Enrolment Quick-Facts of Pre-Service and In-Service Students Teacher Education Institute. Kuala Lumpur: Teacher Education Division
Mishra, P., & Koehler, J. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm
Muyambi, G. C., & Ramorola, M. Z. (2025). Unveiling educators’ readiness to teach through digital media (DM): The case of South Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 13807–13834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13310-w
Pazilah, F. N., Hashim, H., Yunus, M. M., & Rafiq, K. R. M. (2024). Exploring Malaysian ESL Pre-service Teachers' Perceptions on Knowledge of Learners, Digital Literacy and 21st Century Competency. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(1), 300-317.
Sani, K., Ali, M. H., Rahiman, N. H., & Mat Husin, S. F. (2025). Kompetensi pengurusan praktikum serta peranan pensyarah pembimbing di institusi pendidikan swasta: Satu kajian rintis [Practicum management competencies and the role of mentoring lecturers in private educational institutions: A pilot study]. E-Jurnal Penyelidikan dan Inovasi, 12(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.53840/ejpi.v12i1.217
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Asif, M. (2024). Factors affecting generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, use in higher education: An application of technology acceptance model. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4084
Tong, Q., & Rahman, M. J. A. (2025). The effectiveness in the application of artificial intelligence technology at the primary school in Shandong, China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1316–1322.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. SAGE Open, 14(1), 21582440241229570.
Zainul Ekhwan, A. S., Wahab, S. N., Daud, A., Othman, N., & Balasubramanian, S. (2025). Breaking barriers in rural mobility and education in Malaysia through a systematic literature review. Asian Education and Development Studies, 14(4), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-01-2025-0003
Zhai, X. (2024). Transforming teachers’ roles and agencies in the era of generative AI: Perceptions, acceptance, knowledge, and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10174-0
Zou, L., Zhang, Z., Mavilidi, M. (2025) The synergy of embodied cognition and cognitive load theory for optimized learning. Nat Hum Behav 9, 877–885 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02152-2
Azaman, M. H., Zabit, M. N. M., Khalid, P. Z. M., Shahuddin, S. A., Ahmad, M. F., & Manan, A. F. C. (2025). Integrating Technology for Sustainable Education: A Study on the Support Systems for Pre-Service Teachers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 2139–2156.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode