ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study addresses a critical gap in understanding how artificial intelligence (AI) systems construct evaluative discourse in language education contexts. While AI-powered feedback tools increasingly supplement or replace human assessment in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction, limited attention has been paid to the discursive mechanisms through which these systems position learners, construct authority, and shape pedagogical relationships. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this article develops a comprehensive framework for analyzing AI feedback discourse through a comparative analysis of two Large Language Models’ (LLMs’) responses to 63 undergraduate EFL descriptive essays. Employing Fairclough’s three-dimensional CDA framework, the analysis reveals distinct patterns in how AI systems construct their evaluative stance, distribute agency, and enact pedagogical authority in feedback. An emergent six-part taxonomy of discourse moves is identified: diagnostic positioning, prescriptive directives, facilitative suggestions, affective engagement, metalinguistic explanation, and comparative benchmarking. Findings indicate that the two LLMs employ contrasting discursive strategies—akin to a mentor versus an examiner—with significant implications for student positioning, learning autonomy, and the nature of pedagogical relationships in digitally mediated contexts. The proposed framework extends CDA methodology to AI-generated educational discourse and offers educators practical tools for critically evaluating AI feedback systems. As educational institutions rapidly adopt AI assessment tools, this taxonomy enables informed decisions about which discursive practices align with desired pedagogical values. The study concludes by discussing implications for student agency, pedagogical authority, and AI literacy in teacher education, and by recommending the development of more pedagogically-aligned AI feedback systems.
Alnemrat, A., Aldamen, H. A. K., Almashour, M., Al-Deaibes, M., & AlSharefeen, R. (2025). AI vs. teacher feedback on EFL argumentative writing: A quantitative study. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1614673. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1614673
Baker, T., & Hübner, S. (2024). Algorithmic governance in higher education: A critical discourse analysis of AI policy rhetoric. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(1), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12458
Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
Biesta, G. (2010). Why 'what works' still won't work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754236
Luke, A. (2002). Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000053
Oravec, J. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence implications for academic cheating: Expanding the dimensions of responsible human-AI collaboration with ChatGPT and Bard. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 213–237.
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and theories: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
Poláková, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students' writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio?cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701476386
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & O'Garro Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2022). The politics of education and technology: Conflicts, controversies, and connections. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research. ReCALL, 36(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265
Tran, T. T. T. (2025). Enhancing EFL writing revision practices: The impact of AI- and teacher-generated feedback and their sequences. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020232
van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI?generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, Article 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071
Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2020). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.
Yang, H., Gao, C., & Shen, H. (2024). Learner interaction with, and response to, AI-programmed automated writing evaluation feedback in EFL writing: An exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 3837–3858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11991-3
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, Article 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586
Ting, L., Singh, C. K. S., Kiong, T. T., Rakhimjonov, F., & Singh, T. S. M. (2025). Mentor or Examiner? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Ai-Generated Feedback in EFL Writing Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(4), 664–684.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode