ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into science education, questions of teacher preparedness and emotional response come to the fore. This quantitative study explored three key dimensions: (a) the levels of AI competency and anxiety among secondary science teachers, (b) differences in these levels based on school location and teaching experience, and (c) how these factors relate to the use of structured, guided, and open inquiry-based teaching practices. A total of 136 teachers from a Malaysian state participated in the study by completing validated Likert-scale surveys. Results showed that teachers generally reported moderate levels of AI competency (M = 3.65, SD = 0.69) and AI-related anxiety (M = 3.24, SD = 0.64). Among the inquiry approaches, guided inquiry was most used, followed by structured and open formats. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that teaching experience had a significant influence on combined competency and anxiety levels, with teachers in the 6–10 years’ experience range reporting the highest competency. School location did not impact competency but did have a small, statistically significant effect on anxiety, with higher levels reported among rural teachers. Correlation analyses further indicated small but positive relationships between AI competency and all three inquiry styles, whereas anxiety showed no significant association with inquiry use. These findings point to AI competency rather than anxiety as the key driver of inquiry-based teaching involving AI. The study highlights the need for targeted professional development that builds classroom-ready AI skills, enhances assessment literacy, and addresses contextual challenges in rural settings.
Azlida, M., Suzieleez Syrene, A. R., Sulaiman, T., & Baki, R. (2015). Relationship between critical thinking disposition and inquiry teaching style among science teachers. Advanced Science Letters, 21(7), 2336–2339. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6268
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2023). Dasar Pendidikan Digital (Digital Education Policy). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/storage/files/shares/Dasar/Dasar%20Pendidikan%20Digital/Digital%20Education%20Policy.pdf dl.acm.org
Min, T., Lee, B., & Jho, H. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in the design of scientific inquiry for middle school students. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13410-1 Frontiers
Mohd Majid. (2005). Kaedah pengkajian pendidikan (Edisi ke-7). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan. Skudai, Johor: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM).
Muhd Al-Aarifin, I., & Jamilah Al-Muhammady, M. (2017). Kahoot: A promising tool for formative assessment in medical education. Education in Medicine Journal, 9(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2017.9.2.2 SpringerLink
Norlela, S. (2017). Enhancing scientific literacy through implementation of inquiry-based science education (IBSE) in Malaysia science curriculum. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 769. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2685 (DOI sudah disediakan oleh anda.)
Nur Faizahton, S., Azimah, N., Bukhari, M., & Yue, W. S. (2022). Pembelajaran berasaskan inkuiri dalam meningkatkan kemahiran literasi sains dan pencapaian murid menerusi persekitaran pembelajaran dalam talian. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i1.1250 mail.msocialsciences.com
Nur Sakinah, Z., & Melor, M. Y. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions and continuance usage intention of artificial intelligence technology in TESL. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(5), 2101–2109. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i5-34 ResearchGate+1
Ouahi, M. B., Lamri, D., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2022). Science teachers’ views on the use and effectiveness of interactive simulations in science teaching and learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a jotse.org
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (5th ed.). Routledge.
Pan, M., Wang, J., & Wang, J. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions. Dalam Proceedings of the 2023 13th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME) (pp. 623–627). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITME60234.2023.00130 SpringerLink+1
Paramasveran, R., & Nurfaradilla, M. N. (2018). Teachers’ concerns on the implementation and practices of i-THINK with Concern Based Adoption Model (CBAM). Creative Education, 9(14), 2183–2191. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914159 SCIRP
Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory. Dalam B. Inhelder, H. H. Chipman, & C. Zwingmann (Pnyt.), Piaget and his school (pp. 11–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2 SpringerLink
Poobalan, N., Zaharudin, R., & Ting Voon, Y. (2019). Penggunaan bahan multimedia interaktif 3D animasi (‘Scratch’) dalam kaedah pembelajaran teradun terhadap minat dan pencapaian murid Tahun 5 bagi mata pelajaran Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 9(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol9.1.6.2019 ejournal.upsi.edu.my
Radif, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Transforming learning environments and enhancing student engagement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2024.1.008 openurl.ebsco.com+1
Ramesh, M. R. (2025). Challenges of integrating artificial intelligence with language curriculum (pp. 205–230)
Revuelta-Domínguez, F. I., Guerra-Antequera, J., González-Pérez, A., Pedrera-Rodríguez, M. I., & González-Fernández, A. (2022). Digital teaching competence: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(11), 6428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116428 MDPI
Ridwan, H., Sutresna, I., & Haryeti, P. (2019). Teaching styles of the teachers and learning styles of the students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012028 Academia
Mahmud, S. N. D., & Ramli, N. A. (2025). Relationships among AI Competency, AI Anxiety, and Inquiry-Based Teaching among Science Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(4), 796–808.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode