ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study employed a dual-task approach to examine the effects of working memory capacity (WMC) on following spoken and written instructions. The participants comprised 26 individuals with high WMC and 26 with low WMC. They completed two types of instruction tasks under interference conditions: spoken instructions paired with an articulatory suppression task, and written instructions paired with a tapping task. In the spoken condition, recall was verbal, whereas in the written condition, recall was action. The results revealed significant main effects of both WMC and dual-task interference on instruction-following performance, as measured by total correct recall. Moreover, a significant interaction between WMC and dual-task interference was found, indicating that interference impaired working memory performance and reduced recall accuracy. Performance was most affected in the verbal recall of spoken instructions with articulatory suppression, especially in the low WMC group.
Allen, R. J., & Waterman, A. H. (2015). How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory?. Memory & Cognition, 43, 555-561.
Baddeley, A., Chincotta, D., & Adlam, A. (2001). Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 130(4), 641.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 8 (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Verswijveren, S. J., Reid, M., Williams, J., Polman, R., ... & Masters, R. S. (2017). Working memory capacity limits motor learning when implementing multiple instructions. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1350.
Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4), 354.
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 12(5), 769-786.
Draheim, C., Pak, R., Draheim, A. A., & Engle, R. W. (2022). The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(4), 1143-1197.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current directions in psychological science, 11(1), 19-23.
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 972.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 128(3), 309.
Gathercole, S. E., Durling, E., Evans, M., Jeffcock, S., & Stone, S. (2008). Working memory abilities and children's performance in laboratory analogues of classroom activities. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(8), 1019-1037.
He, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, X., Sun, K., Lin, X., Wang, X., Li, F., Guo, Y., Feng, T., Zhang, J., Li, C., Tian, W., Liu, X., & Wu, S. (2022). Effects of Audiovisual Interactions on Working Memory Task Performance—Interference or Facilitation. Brain Sciences, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070886
Jaroslawska, A. J., Gathercole, S. E., Logie, M. R., & Holmes, J. (2016). Following instructions in a virtual school: Does working memory play a role?. Memory & Cognition, 44(4), 580-589.
Jaroslawska, A., Gathercole, S., & Holmes, J. (2018). Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 71, 2439 - 2449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817743492
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 132(1), 47.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 133(2), 189.
Klingberg, T. (1998). Concurrent performance of two working memory tasks: potential mechanisms of interference. Cerebral cortex, 8 7, 593-601. https://doi.org/10.1093/CERCOR/8.7.593
Makri, A., & Fiske, A. (2023). Actions versus Words: Exploring the contributions of working memory and motoric coding in children's instruction following using a dual?task paradigm. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 400-411.
Nijboer, M., Borst, J., Rijn, H., & Taatgen, N. (2016). Contrasting single and multi-component working-memory systems in dual tasking. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.003
Oberauer, K., Lange, E., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and resistance to interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 80-96.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.. Psychological bulletin, 116 2, 220-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
Redick, T. S., Calvo, A., Gay, C. E., & Engle, R. W. (2011). Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 308.
Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of memory and language, 39(3), 418-436.
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 125(1), 4.
Yang, T. X., Allen, R. J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2016). Examining the role of working memory resources in following spoken instructions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 186-198.
Yang, T. X., Allen, R. J., Yu, Q. J., & Chan, R. C. (2015). The influence of input and output modality on following instructions in working memory. Scientific reports, 5(1), 17657.
Yang, T., Gathercole, S. E., & Allen, R. J. (2014). Benefit of enactment over oral repetition of verbal instruction does not require additional working memory during encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 186-192.
Yang, T., Su, X., Allen, R. J., Ye, Z., & Jia, L. (2022). Improving older adults’ ability to follow instructions: benefits of actions at encoding and retrieval in working memory. Memory, 30(5), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2022.2035768
Yang, T. X., Allen, R. J., Waterman, A. H., Graham, A. J., Su, X. M., & Gao, Y. (2024). Exploring techniques for encoding spoken instructions in working memory: A comparison of verbal rehearsal, motor imagery, self-enactment and action observation. Memory, 32(1), 41-54.
Bakar, M. A. B. A., Ghani, K. B. A., & Zulkiply, N. B. (2025). Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Task Interference in Following Instructions. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(4), 1137–1148.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode