ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Scientific literacy is a crucial competency in the 21st century, enabling individuals to apply scientific understanding to real-world contexts and make informed decisions. However, discussions on advancing scientific literacy through the SOAR model remain limited compared to other strategic planning frameworks. Therefore, this concept paper aims to describe a strengths-based strategic framework for promoting scientific literacy in Malaysia using the SOAR model. SOAR focuses on four key dimensions: Strengths (S), Opportunities (O), Aspirations (A), and Results (R), emphasising collective visioning and positive transformation rather than deficit analysis. The findings highlight that the SOAR framework offers a systematic approach for leveraging Malaysia’s existing strengths in science education—such as global benchmarking (PISA, TIMSS), inquiry-based pedagogy, and digital innovation—while capitalising on opportunities in curriculum reform, regional collaboration, and technological integration. The aspiration is to nurture ethically grounded, critically thinking, and scientifically literate citizens aligned with Shared Prosperity Vision 2030 (Wawasan Kemakmuran Bersama 2030) and global sustainability goals. The expected results include improved student performance in scientific reasoning, enhanced teacher professionalism, and stronger public trust in science. This study has important implications for policy alignment, teacher education, and curriculum transformation in fostering critical and functional scientific literacy. Future studies could evaluate other strategic models such as SWOT, TOWS and NOISE which offer different analytical perspective and strengthen the conceptual justification of this paper.
Atias, O. (2024). How to teach functional scientific literacy? Be sociocultural, but don’t forget the basics. International Journal of Science Education, 1–5.
Aziz, R. C., Hamzah, S., Amri, A., Hashim, N., Rahim, A., Farha, W., Zulkifli, W., & Ahmad, G. (2019). R Model: An Alternative Approach for 21th Century Education to Shift from “Classroom Management” to "Classroom Leadership. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(2), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i2/6142
Bossér, U. (2024). Transformation of School Science Practices to Promote Functional Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1
Centurino, V. A. S., & Kelly, D. L. (2023). TIMSS 2023 Science Framework. TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks, 19.
Cole, M. L., Stavros, J. M., Cox, J., & Stavros, A. (2022). Measuring Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations, and Results: Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item SOAR Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 854406. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.854406/FULL
Diyasa, I. G. S. M., Purwanto, S., Saputra, W. S. J., & Winardi, S. (2023). Soar Analysis on Marketing Strategy Integrated Online Smart Parking System. IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development), 6(1), 183–189.
Elgahwash, F. O., Ahmed, K., & Al-Magarbi, A. O. (2023). Strengthening Libyan Hospitality: A SOAR Analysis of Digital Marketing Strategies and Practices in the Tourism and Hospitality Sector. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 29(12), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.34894/VQ1DJA
Guerrero, G., Sjöström, J., Fuchs, T. T., Lee, H., & Valladares, L. (2025). Towards critical global functional scientific literacies. International Journal of Science Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2534044
Hazen, R. M., Trefil, J., & Evans, J. (1992). Science Matters: Achieving Scientific Literacy . American Journal of Physics, 60(9), 861–862. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17073
Kumar, A. P., Omprakash, A., Mani, P. K. C., Kuppusamy, M., Wael, D., Sathiyasekaran, B. W. C., Vijayaraghavan, P. V., & Ramasamy, P. (2023). E-learning and E-modules in medical education—A SOAR analysis using perception of undergraduate students. PLOS ONE, 18(5), e0284882. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0284882
Lederman, J., Akerson, V., Bartels, S., & Schwartz, R. (2025). Attention science educators, we have a problem: lack of global functional scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 47(10), 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2361934
Maimatayeva, A., Assilbekova, B., Zhumagulova, K., Galymova, N., & Issayev, G. (2025). Influence of practical training based on virtual reality on functional scientific literacy of secondary schoolchildren (in biology). Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10141–10158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13229-2
Malkawi, A. R. (2022). Science education in the state of Qatar. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6955-2_10
Mohammad Salleh, A. A. H. Bin, & Halim, L. B. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pendidikan STEM: Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan, Sikap, Kemahiran Pedagogi dan Penilaian guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(2), e002146. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i2.2146
Muhammad, H., & Hromada, M. (2023). Evaluating an E-Government Stage Model by Using SOAR-AHP Process. Transportation Research Procedia, 74, 1538–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2023.11.131
Noor, M. S. A. M. (2021). Assessing secondary students’ scientific literacy: A comparative study of suburban schools in England and Malaysia. Science Education International, 32(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i4.9
OECD, O. for E. C. and D. (2023). PISA 2025 SCIENCE FRAMEWORK. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/
Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education, 47(15–16), 2134–2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
Othman, M. K., & Ching, S. K. (2024). Gamifying science education: How board games enhances engagement, motivate and develop social interaction, and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24525–24561. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-024-12818-5
Parno, Putri, M. K., Munfaridah, N., Khusaini, Fitri, N., & Ali, M. (2024). Exploration of students’ scientific literacy in work and energy through STEM-based 7E learning cycle with formative assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2684(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2684/1/012004
Putri, A. I., & Pertiwi, V. I. (2025). Analisis SOAR Terhadap Strategi Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Melalui Pejabat Pengelola Informasi dan Dokumentasi Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Tata Sejuta STIA Mataram, 11(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.32666/TATASEJUTA.V11I1.661
Sjöström, J. (2025). Vision III of scientific literacy and science education: an alternative vision for science education emphasising the ethico-socio-political and relational-existential. Studies in Science Education, 61(2), 239–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2405229;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Stavros, J. M., & Hinrichs, G. (2009). The thin book of SOAR: Building strengths-based strategy. Thin Book Publishing.
Loong, C. K., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2025). SOARing toward Scientific Literacy: A Strategic Model for Empowering Science Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(4), 2210–2219.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode