ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This systematic review investigates the psychological factors that influence learners’ engagement and academic performance in blended learning environments. Guided by the PRISMA framework, 26 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 were analysed. The synthesis identified six key psychological factors that shape learners’ engagement and learning outcomes in blended learning, which are motivation, emotional engagement, psychological capital, cognitive engagement, social presence and interaction, and technology acceptance and design quality. Intrinsic motivation and emotional engagement consistently predicted academic success, while psychological capital, which includes resilience and self-efficacy, supported persistence in demanding learning contexts. Cognitive engagement, expressed through active thinking and problem-solving, and social presence, developed through peer and instructor interaction, further enhanced learning experiences. Furthermore, technology acceptance and design quality were found to influence satisfaction and engagement, especially when learning tools were reliable and user-friendly. These findings can guide educators in designing blended learning environments that promote both engagement and academic performance. This research contributes by providing a comprehensive framework that identifies the interplay of key psychological factors, such as motivation, emotional engagement, and cognitive engagement, in shaping learners' academic performance in blended learning environments. The findings offer practical insights for educators to design more effective, engaging, and supportive blended learning experiences that promote both learner engagement and academic success.
Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ruiz-Ledesma, E. F. (2022). Students’ emotions and engagement in the emerging hybrid learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(16), 10236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610236
Arifani, Y., Mindari, R., Hidayat, N., & Wicaksono, A. S. (2023). Basic psychological needs of in-service EFL teachers in blended professional training: voices of teachers and learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3868-3881. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943691
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., den Brok, P., Biemans, H. J., & Kerman, N. T. (2023). Modeling teachers' and students’ attitudes, emotions, and perceptions in blended education: Towards post-pandemic education. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100803
Chambers, M. A., & Whitfield, C. (2025). Factors influencing postgraduate nursing students’ engagement with online learning in higher education: A mixed methods literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 104570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104570Get rights and content
Chen, T., Luo, H., Feng, Q., & Li, G. (2023). Effect of technology acceptance on blended learning satisfaction: The serial mediation of emotional experience, social belonging, and higher-order thinking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054442
Cooke, P. C., Hajamohideen, N., & Gooneratne, H. (2022). Developing a blended learning postgraduate teaching programme in anaesthesia: pandemic and beyond. Postgraduate medical journal, 98(1161), 559-563. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140155
Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Sternad Zabukovšek, S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500-1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2018-0559
Fisher, R., Perényi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702
Iqbal, J., Asghar, M. Z., Ashraf, M. A., & Yi, X. (2022). The impacts of emotional intelligence on students’ study habits in blended learning environments: the mediating role of cognitive engagement during COVID-19. Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 14.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12010014
Johnson, E., Morwane, R., Dada, S., Pretorius, G., & Lotriet, M. (2018). Adult learners’ perspectives on their engagement in a hybrid learning postgraduate programme. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(2), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1469071
Joos, U., Klümper, C., & Wegmann, U. (2022). Blended learning in postgraduate oral medical and surgical training-An overall concept and way forward for teaching in LMICs. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 12(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.015
Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021Get rights and content
Lisy, K., & Porritt, K. (2016). Narrative synthesis: considerations and challenges. JBI Evidence Implementation, 14(4), 201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XEB.0000511348.97198.8c
Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1357936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936
Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2023). An experience-sampling study of between-and within-individual predictors of emotional engagement in blended learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 107, 102348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102348
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
Morton, C. E., Saleh, S. N., Smith, S. F., Hemani, A., Ameen, A., Bennie, T. D., & Toro-Troconis, M. (2016). Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement?. BMC medical education, 16(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z
Muis, K. R., Ranellucci, J., Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. C. (2015). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students' attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning and Instruction, 38, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.001
Munro, V., Morello, A., Oster, C., Redmond, C., Vnuk, A., Lennon, S., & Lawn, S. (2018). E-learning for self-management support: introducing blended learning for graduate students–a cohort study. BMC medical education, 18(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1328-6
Salim, H., Lee, P. Y., Ghazali, S. S., Ching, S. M., Ali, H., Shamsuddin, N. H., ... & Dzulkarnain, D. H. A. (2018). Perceptions toward a pilot project on blended learning in Malaysian family medicine postgraduate training: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1315-y
Shah, S., Mahboob, U., Junaid, S. M., Siddiqui, S., Jamil, B., & Rehman, S. (2024). Challenges faced by teachers of postgraduate health professions blended learning programs: a qualitative analysis. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05213-8
Tay, H. Y. (2016). Investigating engagement in a blended learning course. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1135772. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1135772
Westerlaken, M., Christiaans-Dingelhoff, I., Filius, R. M., De Vries, B., De Bruijne, M., & Van Dam, M. (2019). Blended learning for postgraduates; an interactive experience. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1717-5
Xu, M. M., Tian, Q., Yu, S. H., Liu, Y. T., Cao, M. L., & Zhang, W. (2023). Cognitive engagement of nursing undergraduates in blended learning: A parallel mixed method study. Nurse Education Today, 130, 105947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105947
Yu, Y., Che Tak, K. B., Bailey, R. P., Samsudin, N., & Ren, C. (2025). The effects of blended learning on learning engagement in physical education among university students in China: the mediating role of attitudes. Sustainability, 17(2), 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020378
Zhao, S., & Song, J. (2022). Unpacking the emotional experiences of learners in a blended learning context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 879696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879696
Angawi, M., & Tasir, Z. (2025). Psychological Factors Influencing Learners’ Engagement and Academic Performance in Blended Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(4), 2373–2388.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode