ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Extensive research has documented language learning strategies (LLS) in second language learning; however, empirical studies focusing specifically on 21st-century university learners engaged in blended English language courses remain limited. Given the increasing importance of English proficiency and the shift toward technology-enhanced learning, understanding how contemporary learners navigate blended learning environments is crucial. This qualitative study explored the language learning strategies used by 12 first-year Malaysian undergraduates—specifically Islamic school leavers—as they engaged in an English proficiency course delivered through a blended learning approach. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, reflective journals, and document analysis, and analyzed thematically using NVivo 12. Four major themes emerged: (1) involving people, (2) utilizing tools, (3) taking actions, and (4) persevering. The findings reveal that students relied heavily on support networks, leveraged diverse digital and non-digital tools, engaged in deliberate learning actions, and demonstrated persistence despite challenges. The blended approach created meaningful opportunities for autonomy, collaboration, and flexible learning. Implications for English language teaching, particularly in tertiary settings with diverse learner backgrounds, are discussed.
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, A. A. (2022). Language learning in the digital age: Examining the role of social media in EFL learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1413–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10683-7
Alhaisoni, E., & Alhaysony, M. (2021). An investigation of Google Translate use by EFL students: Accuracy and strategies. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n1p52
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Metacognitive reading strategies increase L2 performance. The Language Teacher, 27(7), 20–22.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., & Bedenlier, S. (2021). Facilitating student engagement in online and blended learning: A systematic review of learner engagement models. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1992359
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2020). WhatsApp for collaborative learning: Student and teacher perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 6131–6149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10256-4
Chien, S. C. (2020). YouTube-based EFL instruction: Effects on learning and perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 528–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1609052
Choi, J., & Lee, H. (2021). EFL learners' help-seeking behaviours in blended learning environments. System, 98, 102460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102460
Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2020). Help-seeking from teachers and peers in blended EFL classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 35–52. https://doi.org/10125/44712
Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehta, N., & Pawlak, M. (2022). The use of digital tools in ESL/EFL classrooms: A review of literature. Language Teaching Research, 26(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221100287
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Motivation and second language acquisition. Routledge.
Ghufron, M. A., & Nurdianingsih, F. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of collaborative WhatsApp learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(8), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12849
Hashim, H. U., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). Digital scaffolding tools for vocabulary learning among ESL learners. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.26
Kan, Q., & Bax, S. (2021). Language learner autonomy and digital learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640743
Kessler, G. (2021). Technology and language learning: Teacher and student experiences. Language Teaching, 54(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000516
Kim, H. (2016). Voluntary help-seeking and proficiency in L2 writing. System, 56, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.003
Klimova, B. (2021). Blended learning in EFL: Benefits and limitations. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3647–3656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10481-3
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. (2020). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative. Routledge.
Lee, J. S. (2020). Informal digital learning of English and its impact on speaking skills. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10125/44760
Lee, S. M. (2022). Google Translate as a writing support tool for EFL learners. System, 107, 102802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102802
Lee, W., & Hsieh, J. (2020). Willingness to communicate in blended learning. ReCALL, 32(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000019
Lin, C. Y., & Wang, Y. T. (2024). Effects of video-based input on EFL learners’ pronunciation and listening. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1–2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2060860
Liu, X., & Stapleton, P. (2022). Metacognitive writing strategies in blended L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 101884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.101884
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. (2020). LMS-supported online and blended learning: A meta-analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 46, 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100731
Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2021). A psychology for language learning in the digital age. System, 99, 102508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102508
Nureni, F., & Yahaya, M. F. (2022). Translation strategies among Malaysian EFL learners. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(4), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-12
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Routledge.
Peters, E., Noreillie, A., & Tagarelli, K. (2022). Vocabulary learning through audiovisual input. Language Learning, 72(S2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12493
Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research on learner autonomy in language learning. Language Teaching, 50(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000233
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning from watching video. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000709
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2022). Autonomous L2 learning with digital tools. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 763–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3040
Sun, P. P., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Family engagement in EFL learning and learner motivation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(8), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1596322
Sung, K. (2021). Informal conversational English learning among university students. System, 103, 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102628
Swain, M. (1995). The output hypothesis. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Metacognition and self-regulated learning in digital L2 environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 659–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1682171
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, T., Dai, W., & Lin, C. H. (2023). Digital tools and language learning strategies in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11245–11262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11762-3
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2020). How vocabulary grows through reading and listening. Language Teaching, 53(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000281
Zhang, L. J., & Teng, M. F. (2021). Strategy instruction for digital L2 writing. System, 97, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431
Wahab, N. A. (2025). Unveiling University Students’ Learning Strategies in a Blended English Language Course. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(4), 2186–2195.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode