ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
The increasing integration of Generative AI (Gen-AI) tools in higher education has transformed students’ learning processes, offering benefits such as enhanced productivity, idea generation, and writing assistance. However, concerns are growing over students’ dependency on these tools and its impact on cognitive development and academic integrity. This study investigates how postgraduate students at KPPIM, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), transition from using Gen-AI as an academic aid to developing a dependency that may undermine critical thinking, problem-solving, and ethical decision-making. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study adopts a quantitative research approach to analyze the relationship between students’ perceptions of Gen-AI (Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use), their dependency behaviors, and their ability to uphold academic integrity. Data will be collected through structured surveys, using validated instruments such as the Dependence on Artificial Intelligence (DAI) Scale and the Academic Integrity Scale (AIS). Regression analysis will be employed to examine the influence of AI dependency on students' ethical academic practices. The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights into the ethical implications of AI usage in education. By identifying the factors contributing to Gen-AI dependency and its effects on academic integrity, this research will support the development of institutional policies, ethical guidelines, and AI literacy programs to promote responsible AI use in higher education. Ultimately, the study aims to contribute to the broader discourse on balancing AI’s benefits with the need for academic integrity and independent learning.
Amaro, I., Barra, P., Greca, A. D., Francese, R., & Tucci, C. (2024). Believe in artificial intelligence? A user study on the chatgpt’s fake information impact. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11(4), 5168–5177. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2023.3291539
Billingsley, W. (2024). If cheating is optimisation then assessment must not be pure. Learning Letters, 4, 28. https://doi.org/10.59453/ll.v4.28
Branch campuses. (n.d.). College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics. Retrieved December 5, 2024, from https://kppim.uitm.edu.my/discover-us/branch-campuses
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2023). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
Husna, N. (2020). Reducing cheating chances by involving critical thinking skills within the assessments: Students’ perspective. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education in Muslim Society, ICEMS 2019,30 September - 01 October 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-9-2019.2291188
Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. K. S. (2017). Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(03), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203056567
Morales-García, W. C., Sairitupa-Sanchez, L. Z., Morales-García, S. B., & Morales-García, M. (2024). Development and validation of a scale for dependence on artificial intelligence in university students. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323898
Nguyen, T. N. T., Lai, N. V., & Nguyen, Q. T. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) in education: A case study on chatgpt’s influence on student learning behaviors. Educational Process International Journal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.132.7
Ramdani, Z. (2018). Construction of academic integrity scale. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3003
Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability, 16(13), 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367
Sohail, S. S., Madsen, D. Ø., Himeur, Y., & Ashraf, M. (2023). Using ChatGPT to navigate ambivalent and contradictory research findings on artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1195797
Tsufim, F., & Pomerleau, L. (2024, April 18). More is Less?: Using Generative AI for Idea Generation and Diversification in Early Writing Processes. Utah State University. https://uen.pressbooks.pub/teachingandgenerativeai/chapter/more-is-less-using-genera tive-ai-for-idea-generation-and-diversification-in-early-writing-processes/
Wilson, P. (2020). Academic fraud. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 7(3), 14–44. https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v7i3.546
Wiredu, J. K., Seidu Abuba, N., & Zakaria, H. (2024). Impact of generative AI in academic integrity and learning outcomes: A case study in the Upper East Region. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 17(8), 10-9734.
Zastudil, C., Rogalska, M., Kapp, C., Vaughn, J., & MacNeil, S. (2023, October). Generative ai in computing education: Perspectives of students and instructors. In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
Azhar, N. F. B., Aziz, A. A., Ismail, A., & Sakamat, N. (2025). The Effect of Generative AI Dependency on Academic Integrity among Postgraduate Students at KPPIM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(12), 2731–2743.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode