ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This integrative conceptual review synthesises current scholarship on teacher agency in the context of China’s Curriculum-based Ideological and Moral Education (CIME) reform, with particular attention to College English teaching. Drawing on ecological, sociocultural, identity-based, and value-oriented perspectives, the review shows that teacher agency under CIME is a dynamic, interpretive, and contextually mediated process shaped by the interaction of personal beliefs, institutional structures, and broader cultural–discursive frameworks. The enactment of agency involves teachers’ interpretive judgment, negotiation of pedagogical and value-oriented expectations, emotional meaning-making, and adaptive classroom practices. The review proposes a three-level ecological system—personal, institutional, and cultural–discursive—to explain the enabling and constraining conditions shaping agency in this reform environment. By integrating insights across diverse strands of literature, the review extends international understandings of teacher agency to ideologically framed curriculum reforms and highlights the need to consider value orientations, identity negotiations, and discursive contexts in future analyses. Implications are offered for teacher education, institutional leadership, and policy development, alongside directions for future research.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.
Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560.
Cheng, J. Y., & Wei, L. (2021). Individual agency and changing language education policy in China: Reactions to the new “Guidelines on College English Teaching”. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 117–135.
Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616.
Edwards, A. (2017). Working relationally in and across practices: A cultural-historical approach to collaboration. Cambridge University Press.
Han, X. Z. (2019). ??????????????? [Several key issues in deepening curriculum-based ideological and political education]. ???????? [Guide to Ideological and Theoretical Education], 7, 88–93.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
Huang, G. W. (2022). ???????????????????? [Reconstructing the value of foreign language education and expanding its pathways under the New Liberal Arts initiative]. ??? [Foreign Language World], 195(3), 2–9.
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899–916.
Li, X. L. (2023). A theoretical review on the interplay among EFL teachers’ professional identity, agency, and positioning. Heliyon, 9(4), e15510.
Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517–528.
Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Open University Press.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). Bloomsbury.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425.
Schutz, P. A., & Zembylas, M. (Eds.). (2009). Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives. Springer.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Sun, Y., & Shen, Q. (2023). ???????????????????? [Systematic integration of curriculum-based ideological and moral education into College English curriculum planning]. ??? [Foreign Language World], 206(2), 15–24.
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346–355.
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
Wang, L. (2022). English language teacher agency in response to curriculum reform in China: An ecological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 935038.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.
Zhang, B. (2023). Practical Research of Ideological and Political Education in College English Course under the Background of New Liberal Arts. OALib, 10(11), 1-18.
Yanling, B., Rahman, A. B. A., & Yik, L. H. (2026). Teacher Agency in the Context of China’s Curriculum-based Ideological and Moral Education (CIME): A Integrative Conceptual Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(1), 523–538.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode