ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Despite increasing access to educational technology, summative assessment practices in many schools remain predominantly paper-based. This mixed-methods study investigated English language teachers’ preferences for summative assessment methods and explored the reasons underlying continued reliance on traditional paper-based assessments in the Malaysian context. An explanatory sequential design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through a survey administered to 30 English language teachers from primary schools, in Sandakan, Sabah, followed by semi-structured interviews with 10 selected participants. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis were used to analyse the survey data, while thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts. The quantitative findings revealed that a majority of teachers preferred paper-based summative assessments, particularly among those with longer teaching experience. Technical challenges and lack of institutional support were significant predictors of preference for traditional assessment methods, whereas perceived usefulness and confidence in using digital tools were associated with greater acceptance of digital assessment. Qualitative findings further indicated that teachers valued the reliability and familiarity of paper-based assessments and expressed concerns regarding infrastructure, training, and policy clarity. However, teachers also acknowledged the potential of digital tools to enhance feedback efficiency and student performance tracking. The study concludes that teachers’ assessment preferences are shaped primarily by contextual and systemic constraints rather than resistance to innovation. The findings highlight the need for improved infrastructure, targeted professional development, and clearer policy support to facilitate the effective integration of digital tools in summative assessment practices in English language education.
Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
Bennett, R. E. (2021). Formative and summative assessment: What's the difference? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(1), 4–15.
Bennett, R. E. (2021). Educational assessment: Issues and practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2020). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dawadi, S. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611786.pdf
DeLuca, C., Willis, J., Cowie, B., Harrison, C., Coombs, A., & Gibson, A. (2021). Policies, programs, and practices shaping classroom assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1838484
Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Digital learning readiness and English language teaching in Malaysian schools. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16200
Hashim, H., Yunus, M. M., & Norman, H. (2022). Technology-enhanced English language learning: Malaysian teachers’ perspectives and practices. Sustainability, 14(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042045
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2845–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-6
Ifenthaler, D., Mah, D.-K., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2021). Assessment and analytics in digital education. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106699
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2020). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819840882
Lian, L. H. (2025). Investigating the interrelationship between teachers’ grading practices, assessment beliefs, and summative assessment methods in Malaysian schools. Asian Journal of University Education, 21(1), 145–162. https://ajue.uitm.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/12-Shahazwan_Investigating-the-Interrelationship.pdf
Majuddin, N. A., Ahmad, M., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2022). Teachers’ assessment practices in Malaysian primary schools: A mixed-methods approach. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.1
Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J.-H. (2025). Purposive Sampling: A Review and Guidelines for Quantitative Designs. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 2590–4221. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01
Nikian, S., Mohamad Nor, F., & Aziz, M. A. (2013). Malaysian teachers’ perception of applying technology in assessment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.381
O’Loughlin, K. (2023). Technology-enhanced language assessment: Recent developments and challenges. Language Testing, 40(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221113927
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2022). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are and how to get there. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2071661
Pallant, J. (2020). Ebook: SPSS Surival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Razali, R., Noor, N. M., & Azman, H. (2020). Examination-oriented assessment practices in Malaysian classrooms: Teachers’ beliefs and constraints. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(4), 2577–2594.
Razali, R., & Noor, N. M. (2021). Teachers’ assessment literacy and challenges in implementing alternative assessment in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.1
Razali, M. A., Md Yunus, M., & Hashim, H. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of traditional and alternative assessment in Malaysian ESL classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.2
Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2021). Changing assessment—Changing education: Digital assessment and the role of feedback. European Journal of Education, 56(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12421
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2020). The technology acceptance model in education. Computers & Education, 144, 103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103706
Stobart, G., & Hopfenbeck, T. (2021). Validity, reliability and fairness in assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1866727
Tay, L. Y. (2022). English language teachers’ beliefs and practices in classroom assessment: Evidence from Malaysian schools. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(3), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i3.18964
Tonkin-Crine, S. (2016). Using mixed methods research to evaluate complex interventions: A practical guide. BMJ Open, 6(1), e010537. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010537
Tsagari, D. (2021). Language assessment literacy for teachers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1893703
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance on generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
Wahab, A. A., Abdullah, M. Y., & Rahman, N. A. (2022). Challenges in implementing digital assessment in Malaysian schools: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp45-63
Yin, R. K. (2023). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yunus, M. M., Hashim, H., & Mahmud, M. (2022). Digital education tools and assessment transformation in Malaysian ESL classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.1
Yunus, M. M., & Tan, K. H. (2021). ESL teachers’ acceptance of digital assessment tools in Malaysian classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(6), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.6.9
Yusoff, M. S. (2025). Teachers’ preferences and challenges in implementing digital summative assessment in Malaysian secondary schools. Asian Journal of University Education, 21(1), 163–180.
Sean, C. L., & Zakaria, N. Y. K. B. (2026). English Teachers’ Perception of Digital Summative Assessment in Malaysian Primary Schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(1), 756–774.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode