The Influence of Teaching Design and School Support in Blended Teaching on Student Satisfaction with Perceived Usefulness as Mediator

Abuhassna, H., & Alnawajha, S. (2023). Instructional design made easy! Instructional design models, categories, frameworks, educational context, and recommendations for future work. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(4), 715-735.
Almulla, M. (2021). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and e-learning system use for education sustainability. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 1-13.
Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and information technologies, 26(5), 5499-5533.
Beltrán, A. O., Hernández-Leo, D., & Amarasinghe, I. (2023). Surviving and thriving: How changes in teaching modalities influenced student satisfaction before, during and after COVID-19. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 72-88.
Bhagat, K. K., Cheng, C. H., Koneru, I., Fook, F. S., & Chang, C. Y. (2023). Students’ blended learning course experience scale (BLCES): Development and validation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3971-3981.
Bossman, A., & Agyei, S. K. (2022). Technology and instructor dimensions, e-learning satisfaction, and academic performance of distance students in Ghana. Heliyon, 8(4).
Bottiani, J. H., Bradshaw, C. P., & Mendelson, T. (2016). Inequality in Black and White high school students' perceptions of school support: An examination of race in context. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(6), 1176-1191.
Bui, T. K. P., & Bui, T. V. A. (2023). Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning: An Online Survey in a Vietnamese University. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 39(2).
Cheng, X., Mo, W., & Duan, Y. (2023). Factors contributing to learning satisfaction with blended learning teaching mode among higher education students in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1193675.
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C., & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers & education, 45(4), 399-416.
Chiu, T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124.
Dinh, T. C., Dao, K. T., Quach, D. K., Ha, N. P. T., & Ho, M. C. (2021). Factors affect students’ satisfaction in blended learning courses in a private university in Vietnam. Essays in Education, 28(1), 2.
Fang, Y. (2024). Exploring the Effectiveness of Online-Offline Blended Teaching Mode in College English Teaching Based on Mobile Education Platform. technology, 7(10), 133-141.
Feriana, D., & Ulfatun, T. (2024). The role of school culture in shaping a positive learning environment. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 126-131.
Fisher, R., Perényi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97-113.
Ghazal, S., Aldowah, H., & Umar, I. (2018). Critical factors to learning management system acceptance and satisfaction in a blended learning environment. In Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technology: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology (IRICT 2017) (pp. 688-698). Springer International Publishing.
Govender, D. (2024). Higher Education Students' Perception of Key Instructional Design Elements in Online Learning Materials. UnisaRxiv.
Hashim, H., Mohamad, S. A., Che Hamzah, H., & Azer, I. (2023). The role of perceived usefulness and confirmation in influencing student’s satisfaction on online distance learning. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 19(2), 294-306.
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach ( 3rd ed., pp. 1–732). The Guilford Publications.
He, Y., & Fu, X. (2022). Learning satisfaction of learners and curriculum design under different online teaching platforms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(10), 227-239.
Huang, C. H. (2021). Using PLS-SEM model to explore the influencing factors of learning satisfaction in blended learning. Education Sciences, 11(5), 249.
Kakada, P., Deshpande, Y., & Bisen, S. (2019). Technology support, social support, academic support, service support, and student satisfaction. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18.
Kobayashi, K., & Little, A. (2011). Learner perceptions on the usefulness of a blended learning EFL program. The Jalt Call Journal, 7(1), 103-117.
Lane, S., Hoang, J. G., Leighton, J. P., & Rissanen, A. (2021). Engagement and satisfaction: Mixed-method analysis of blended learning in the sciences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 100-122.
Le, H. V. (2025). Assessing student satisfaction with MOOCs: a comprehensive analysis of Coursera's instructional design and learner experience. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42(2), 207-223.
Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The internet and higher education, 13(4), 277-283.
Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T., & Parastika, A. (2022). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 512-520.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nuryakin, N., Rakotoarizaka, N. L. P., & Musa, H. G. (2023). The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived easy to use on student satisfaction the mediating role of attitude to use online learning. APMBA (Asia Pacific Management and Business Application), 11(3), 323-336.
Onecha, B., Cornadó, C., Morros, J., & Pons, O. (2023). New approach to design and assess metaverse environments for improving learning processes in higher education: The case of architectural construction and rehabilitation. Buildings, 13(5), 1340.
Pei, L., Poortman, C., Schildkamp, K., & Benes, N. (2024). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of a sense of community in blended education. Education and information technologies, 29(2), 2117-2155.
Prawisanthi, N. W. T. A., & Permana, I. G. Y. (2022). Blended learning during pandemic: EFL undergraduate students’ satisfaction. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 160-166.
Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performance in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and information technologies, 26(3), 2623-2656.
Sakalli, Ö., Altinay, F., Altinay, M., & Dagli, G. (2021). How Primary School Children Perceive Tolerance by Technology Supported Instruction in Digital Transformation During Covid 19. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 1-5.
Suson, R. (2024). Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction in Blended Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 207-227.
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students' academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12).
Tuiloma, S., Graham, C. R., Arias, A. M. M., & Caicedo, D. M. P. (2022). Providing institutional support for academic engagement in online and blended learning programs. Education Sciences, 12(10), 641.
Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247-264.
Wang, J., Yang, Y., Li, H., & van Aalst, J. (2021). Continuing to teach in a time of crisis: The Chinese rural educational system's response and student satisfaction and social and cognitive presence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1494-1512.
Wang, X., & Sun, X. (2022). Higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Responses and challenges. Education as Change, 26(1), 1-21.
Wen, H. (2025). Research on the Factors Impacting University Students’ Satisfaction in Blended Learning: A Case Study on Private University in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(4), 581-596.
Zeqiri, J., Kareva, V., & Alija, S. (2021). Blended learning and student satisfaction: The moderating effect of student performance. Business Systems Research: International journal of the Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, 12(2), 79-94.
Zhang, Y. G., & Dang, M. Y. (2020). Understanding essential factors in influencing technology-supported learning: A model toward blended learning success. Journal of Information Technology Education. Research, 19, 489.
Zhang, Z., Xu, Q., Koehler, A. A., & Newby, T. (2023). Comparing Blended and Online Learners' Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, and Actual Learning in the Context of Educational Technology. Online Learning, 27(4), 295-314.
Zhao, R., & Chen, J. (2014). Scaffolding, perceived usefulness, satisfaction and continuance intention toward online foreign language learning. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 77, 5.

Jing, C., & Abdullah, S. M. B. (2026). The Influence of Teaching Design and School Support in Blended Teaching on Student Satisfaction with Perceived Usefulness as Mediator. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(1), 882–893.

Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode