ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Modeling is widely recognized as a core scientific practice and a key component of science learning. Although research on modeling and modeling competencies has expanded substantially in recent decades, the overall knowledge structure and thematic development of this field remain insufficiently synthesized. To address this gap, this study presents a bibliometric review of modeling-related research in science education. Using the Scopus database, 322 English-language journal articles published between 1990 and 2023 were analyzed with CiteSpace. Publication trends, keyword co-occurrence networks, and thematic clusters were examined to map the evolution and structure of the research field. The results show a sustained increase in modeling-related studies since the mid-2010s, with a strong focus on instructional practices and technology-supported modeling environments. In contrast, studies that explicitly conceptualize modeling competencies as integrated learning outcomes, particularly in secondary education contexts, remain limited.By systematically mapping research trends and thematic relationships, this review clarifies the current landscape of modeling research and identifies underexplored directions for future inquiry. The findings provide a foundation for advancing theoretically coherent and empirically grounded research on modeling competencies in science education.
Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. Nova Science Publishers.
Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2019). modeling competencies in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-11.
Chiu, M. H., & Zeng, M. R. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in chemistry education: Cultivating modeling and systems thinking competencies. African Journal of Chemical Education, 13(2), 162–198.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dori, Y. J., & Kaberman, Z. (2012). Assessing high school chemistry students’ modeling skills in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9172-4
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3–17). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280907
Ingham, A. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (1991). The use of analog models by students of chemistry at higher education level. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 193–202.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387.
Jian, M., Jin, D., & Wu, X. (2023). Research hotspots and development trends of international learning cycle model: Bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. Heliyon, 9(11), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22076
Li, Y. F., & Yu, F. X. (2023). A practical study on the assessment of cognitive literacy in high school chemistry models. Chemistry Education, 45(5), 9-23.
López-Vargas, O., Duarte-Suárez, L., & Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J. (2017). Teacher’s computer self-efficacy and its relationship with cognitive style and TPACK. Improving Schools, 20(3), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480217704263
Nicolaou, C. T., & Constantinou, C. P. (2014). Assessment of the modeling competence: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 13, 52-73.
Nielsen, S. S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2021). A competence-oriented approach to models and modelling in lower secondary science education: Practices and rationales among Danish teachers. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl. 2), 565–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09900-1
Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125-143.
Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students' dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 215-234.
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G. D., & Mamiala, T. L. (2004). Students' understanding of the descriptive and predictive nature of teaching models in organic chemistry. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 1-20.
Yang, Y. Q. (2017). Assessment research on the model cognition competencies of core competencies in chemistry. Chemistry Education, 7(5), 9–14.
Wei, S., Liu, X., & Jia, Y. (2014). Using Rasch measurement to validate the instrument of Students’ Understanding of Models in Science (SUMS). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1067-1082.
Zupic, I., & ?ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
Wang, J. F. (2026). A Bibliometric Review of Modeling Competencies: Mapping Research Trends and Knowledge Structure. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(1), 826–838.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode