Exploring Constructivist Grounded Theory Methodology in Educational Research: A Systematic Review from the Perspective of a Novice Researcher in Malaysia

Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
Charmaz, K. (2006; 2014). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2020). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory. San Diego: Academic Press.
Ejnavarzala, H. (2019). Epistemology–Ontology Relations in Social Research: A Review. Sociological Bulletin, 68(1), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022918819369
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967/2006). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, U.S.A., & London, U.K.: AldineTransaction, a Division of Transaction Publishers.
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality: Considering its influence and place in qualitative research - A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
Je?ábek, H. (2022). Paul Lazarsfeld’s methodological innovations and their importance today. International Journal of Communication, 16, 636–645. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/18733/3666
Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist Grounded Theory: Methodological and Philosophical Conflicts. The Qualitative Report. Advanced online publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282956097
Kabir, R., Hayhoe, R., Bai, A. C. M., Vinnakota, D., Sivasubramanian, M., Afework, S., Chilaka, M., Mohammadnezhad, M., Aremu, O., Sah, R. K., Khan, H. T. A., Messner, S., Syed, H. Z., & Parsa, A. D. (2023). The systematic literature review process: A simple guide for public health and allied health students. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 11(9), 3498–3506. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20233532
Kho, S. H., & Mathew, S. S. A. B. M. (2024). Action research and primary school teachers in Malaysia: A teacher professional development programme. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 8(1), 1-10. eISSN 2550-2158. https://www.masree.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1ICOFEA-23-007-KHO-SIAW-HUI.pdf
Mallow, M. S. (2024, June 2). Time to abolish exams, and stop obsession with grades. The Malaysian Insight. https://www.themalaysianinsight.com/s/483741
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025: Preschool to post-secondary education. Ministry of Education Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/dasar/1207-malaysia-education-blueprint-2013-2025/file
Morhan, S. (2024). National education system labelled ‘dismal failure.’ The Sun Daily. https://thesun.my/malaysia-news/national-education-system-labelled-dismal-failure-KA12030912
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016). Country Paper: Malaysia (6th Annual Forum of BE). Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO). https://www.seameo.org/_files/PPT_6thAnnual_Forum_of_BE_Indonesia/Powerpoints%20&%20Papers%20for%20Report/Member%20Countires%20Presentation/MALAYSIA%20paper_6th%20Annual%20Forum%202016%20Indonesia.pdf
Mises, L. v. (1949). Human action: A treatise on economics. Yale University Press.
Noor, N. M. (2024). Multicultural policies in Malaysia: Challenges, successes, and the future. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2024/06/01/multicultural-policies-in-malaysia-challenges-successes-and-the-future/
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
O'Mahony, S. (2024). Applying a systematic literature review process in a grounded theory investigation. Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited. https://www.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/applying-systematic-literature-review-process/docview/3092061741/se-2
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A. McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Sauce, B., & Matzel, L. (2017). Inductive reasoning. In J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behaviour. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1045-1
Schober, P., & Vetter, T. R. (2020). Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research. Anesthesia and analgesia, 131(4), 1090–1091. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005001
Shrestha, P. R. (2024). Grounded theory as a qualitative research method. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36446.24647. https://www.researchgate.net/publicati on/380440625_Grounded_Theory_as_a_Qualitative_ResearchMethod
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1996/2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Stough, L. M., & Lee, S. (2021). Grounded Theory Approaches Used in Educational Research Journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177_16094069211052203
Suddaby, R. (2006). From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020
Tedja, B., Al Musadieq, M., Kusumawati, A., & et al. (2024). Systematic literature review using PRISMA: Exploring the influence of service quality and perceived value on satisfaction and intention to continue the relationship. Future Business Journal, 10(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00326-4
Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed Grounded Theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
Tsulaia, N. (2023, May). Constructivism as a theory of learning (foundations and significance). Paper presented at the Basics of Learning: The Latest Theories and Methods Conference, Boston, USA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372244917_Constructivism_as_a_theory_of_learning_foundations_and_significance
Deshmukh, M., Sharma, D., Prasad, S., Dey, S., & Rai, A. (2024). Contemporary meaning of caste discrimination in Indian universities: A constructivist grounded theory. Higher Education, 88(4), 1503-1524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01180-7
Nugroho, K. Y., Anwar, C., & Hartono. (2024). Social constructivist mentoring program to support teacher professional development: An action research approach. The Qualitative Report, 29(5), 1416-1436. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6634
Chhetri, S. B., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2024). Professors' informal learning in their workplace: The case of Nepali university. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 1173-1191. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6492
Gould-Yakovleva, O., & Liu, X. (2024). Mutualism as mutual trust: An ethnographic case study on an elementary-school teacher-team participation in a science PD program. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 915-938. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6440
Uwajeneza, P., Babenko-Mould, Y., Evans, M., & Mukamana, D. (2024). Teaching family planning to nurse and midwife students: A constructivist grounded theory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 76, 103916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103916
Luedke, C. L., Contreras-García, N., & Golden, C. (2024). The role of relational reciprocity: How students’ families support and influence them during the transition to higher education. Education Sciences, 14(7), 689. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070689
Akcay, B., & Benek, ?. (2024). Problem-based learning in türkiye: A systematic literature review of research in science education. Education Sciences, 14(3), 330. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030330
Amorim, C., & Ribeiro-Silva, E. (2024). Cooperating teachers’ perceptions and contributions to preservice teachers’ professional identities. Education Sciences, 14(2), 167. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020167
Morris, D. L. (2024). Reflections of a first-year chemistry teacher: Intersecting PCK, responsiveness, and inquiry instruction. Education Sciences, 14(1), 93. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010093
Pilotti, D. M., Harbour, K. E., Miller, B. T., & Larkin, E. K. (2024). Creating cohesion and collaboration in mathematics classrooms: Implementing interdepartmental professional learning communities to support students with disabilities. Education Sciences, 14(1), 50. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010050
Bally, J. M. G., Bullin, C., Oswal, J., Norbye, B., & Neuls, E. S. (2023). “Balancing two worlds”: A constructivist grounded theory exploring distributed/decentralised nursing education in rural and remote areas in Canada and Norway. International Journal of Circumpolar Health (Online), 82(1) doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2281100
Eva, H. C., Forsberg, C., & Thornberg, R. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on factors influencing the school climate: A constructivist grounded theory case study. Cogent Education, 10(2) doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2245171
Farrell, I. C., Minton, C. A. B., & DeDiego, A. C. (2023). Doctoral students balancing the roles and relationships of counsellor education. The Qualitative Report, 28(12), 3536-3552. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6317
Nelson, H. J., Bally, J. M. G., Spurr, S., Foulds, H., & de Padua, A. (2023). Integrating constructivist grounded theory with a patient-oriented research approach to enhance health promotion research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22 doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231218657
Snyder, M. M., Kramer, S., Lippe, D., & Sankar, S. (2023). Design and implementation of 360-degree video vignettes in immersive virtual reality: A quality management in higher education case. The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 2113-2155. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6140
Yanto, E. S., & Ramdani, J. M. (2023). Engaging students in qualitative research practice and understanding through constructionist perspectives: Socially constructed qualitative research pedagogies. The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 2156-2171. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6530
Shamburg, C., O'Neill, V., Jimenez, R., Rodriguez, J., & Harb, K. (2023). Podcast listening and informal learning. The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 2033-2057. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5862
Straughair, C., Allan, J., Conner, T., Morgan, D., & Machin, A. (2023). Educators’ perceptions of their experiences of Transnational education in nursing: A grounded theory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 70, 103649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103649
Lindqvist, H., & Forsberg, C. (2023). Constructivist grounded theory and educational research: Constructing theories about teachers’ work when analysing relationships between codes. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46(2), 200-210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2095998
Shokeen, E., Weintrop, D., Pellicone, A. J., Moon, P. F., Ketelhut, D., Cukier, M., & Plane, J. D. (2023). Defining perplexity and reflective thinking in a game-based learning environment. Information and Learning Science, 124(3), 110-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2022-0112
Isaac, C., & Behar-Horenstein, L. (2023). Grounding qualitative medical research in coherence, not standards. The Qualitative Report, 28(3), 717-734. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5698
Lavanti, L., Harju-Luukkainen, H., & Kuusisto, A. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of the cultural capital of children and families with immigrant backgrounds in early childhood education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 977. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100977
Du Plessis, ,E.C. (2023). The preparedness of student teachers in open and distance learning environments for the classroom. Education Sciences, 13(9), 934. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090934
Clements, D. H., Lizcano, R., & Sarama, J. (2023). Research and pedagogies for early math. Education Sciences, 13(8), 839. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080839
Rudrakumar, S., Varshney, N., & Taylor, D. (2023). Medical student perspectives on substance misuse education in the medical undergraduate programme: A grounded theory approach. BMC Medical Education, 23, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04145-z
Mejeh, M., Hagenauer, G., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Mixed methods research on learning and Instruction—Meeting the challenges of multiple perspectives and levels within a complex field. [Mixed Methods in der Lehr-Lernforschung: Umgang mit Herausforderungen multipler Perspektiven und Ebenen eines komplexen Forschungsfelds] Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1) doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3989
Mulolli, D., & Gothberg, J. (2023). How doctoral students with low GRE scores succeed: A grounded theory study. The Qualitative Report, 28(1), 14-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5672
Deepa, V., Sujatha, R., & Mohan, J. (2022). Unsung voices of technology in school education-findings using the constructivist grounded theory approach. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561- 021-00182-7
T., & Mitchell, D., Jr. (2022). Hidden identity: A constructivist grounded theory of black male identity development at historically black colleges and universities. The Qualitative Report, 27(10), 2251-2277.doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5718
Hewitt, S., Mills, J., Hoare, K., & Sheridan, N. (2022). Grounded theory method and symbolic interactionism: Freedom of conceptualization and the importance of context in research. [Grounded-Theory-Methodologie und symbolischer Interaktionismus: Freiheit der Konzeptualisierung und die Bedeutung des Kontextes in der Forschung] Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 23(3) doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-23.3.3807
Roybal-Lewis, A. (2022). Moving towards proficiency: A grounded theory study of early childhood teacher candidates and professional development schools. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(6), 913-924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01229-7
Oldham, C., & Bradley, K. D. (2022). Exposing the mythology of balance and the ecology of graduate student mother resilience in COVID-19. The Qualitative Report, 27(7), 1197-1219. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5228
Brown, N., & Ramlackhan, K. (2022). Exploring experiences of ableism in academia: A constructivist inquiry. Higher Education, 83(6), 1225-1239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00739-y
Muthanna, A., Almahfali, M., & Haider, A. (2022). The interaction of war impacts on education: Experiences of school teachers and leaders. Education Sciences, 12(10), 719. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100719
Kim, S. Y. (2022). Student confidence, success, and retention: The impact of military experience on the college lives of Korean males. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 268-288. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5107 Ostovar-Namaghi, S., Kamali, S., & Moezzipour, F. (2022). Exploring techniques for addressing grammar in CLT classes: A qualitative study. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 187-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4363
Rania, N., Coppola, I., & Pinna, L. (2021). Adapting qualitative methods during the COVID-19 era: Factors to consider for successful use of online photovoice. The Qualitative Report, 26(8), 0_1,2711-2729. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4863
Parveen, N. (2021). Investigating the memorization of the Quran using the grounded theory methodology. The Qualitative Report, 26(7), 0_1,2225-2244. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4752
Velardo, S., & Elliott, S. (2021). The emotional well-being of doctoral students conducting qualitative research with vulnerable populations. The Qualitative Report, 26(5), 1522-1545. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4421
Kennedy, B. L., & Moore, H. (2021). Grounded duoethnography: A dialogic method for the exploration of intuition through divergence and convergence. [Grounded Duoethnografie: eine dialogische Methode zur Erforschung von Intuition durch Divergenzen und Konvergenzen] Forum : Qualitative Social Research, 22(2) doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.2.3668
Alexander, K. (2020). "It's just a prank, bro!": Examining college hazing with constructivist grounded theory and qualitative research methods. The Qualitative Report, 25(10), 3641-3656. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/just-prank-bro-examining-college-hazing-with/docview/2453907520/se-2?accountid=13155
Morgan, D. L. (2020). Pragmatism as a basis for grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 25(1), 64-73. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/pragmatism-as-basis-grounded-theory/docview/2350113824/se- 2?accountid=13155
Chong, S. L. (2019). A practical application of analytic guiding frame (AGF) and overall guiding frame (OGF): An illustration from literacy education. The Qualitative Report, 24(11), 2747-2758. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/practical-application-analytic-guiding-frame-agf/docview/2322631756/se-2?accountid=13155

Lian, J., & Isa, N. J. M. (2026). Exploring Constructivist Grounded Theory Methodology in Educational Research: A Systematic Review from the Perspective of a Novice Researcher in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(1), 1405–1428.

Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode