ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
The rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Chinese university ideological and political courses has placed frontline teachers in a challenging position. While existing research has focused on macro-level risk warnings, little is known about how teachers can actively govern these risks in their daily practice. This study addresses this gap by conceptualizing the teacher as a "gatekeeper" who filters, critiques, and guides GAI use in value-laden educational contexts. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 20 ideological course instructors and classroom observations across five universities in Jiangxi Province, the study identifies four gatekeeping strategies that teachers spontaneously develop: AI output review, critical questioning in class, boundary setting, and peer consultation. The findings also reveal three governance dilemmas faced by teachers: the lack of standards, time constraints, and institutional policy gaps. Based on these findings, the paper proposes a three-level governance framework operating at the teacher, course, and institution levels. Unlike existing studies that emphasize technological risks or teacher replacement, this framework empowers teachers to become effective gatekeepers without being overwhelmed by technological demands. The study contributes a teacher-centered perspective to GAI governance in politically sensitive educational settings and offers practical tools, including a risk review checklist and teaching scripts.
Barus, O., Hidayanto, A. N., & Eitiveni, I. (2025). Mapping generative AI's ethical issues in higher education: A FELT-guided systematic review. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v21i2.10020
Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2018). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In Artificial intelligence safety and security (pp. 57-69). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Dai, J. P., & Qin, Y. Y. (2023). The ideological risks of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and its response. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 29(5), 101-110.
Floridi, L. (2019). Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: Five risks of being ethical. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981)
Hu, G. (2025). Discursive ethical risks and governance paths of ideological and political courses in universities in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 43(9). (forthcoming)
Jayasinghe, S., Gamage, K. A., Yang, D., Cheng, C., Disanayake, C., & Apeji, U. D. (2026). Six institutional intervention areas to support ethical and effective student use of generative AI in higher education: A narrative review. Education Sciences, 16(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010137
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gaševi?, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human relations, 1(1), 5-41.
Ludi, Z. H. A. O., & Shengli, Q. I. (2025). Ethical risks and prevention of generative artificial intelligence empowering ideological and political education for college students. The Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 45(6), 16-24.
Mak, J., Nakatumba-Nabende, J., Clear, T., Clear, A., Albluwi, I., Andrei, O., Angeli, L., MacNeil, S., Oyelere, S. S., Rattigan, M. H., Sheard, J., & Zhu, T. (2025). Navigating the ethical and societal impacts of generative AI in higher computing education (arXiv:2511.15768v1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.15768
Meng, Q. P., & Yao, H. X. (2025). The internal mechanism, risks and countermeasures of AI-driven teaching reform in university ideological and political courses. Modern Distance Education Research, 37(3). (forthcoming)
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Wang, S. J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The basic logic and contradiction adaptation of generative AI intervening in ideological and political education: From ChatGPT to GPT-4o. Ideological Education Research, 2024(12), 52-58.
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE Publications.
Yan, R. F. (2025). Ethical risks and resolution paths of generative AI empowering ideological and political education: An investigation based on the perspective of educational object subjectivity. Marxist Studies Network. http://marxism.cass.cn/zzjy/202510/t20251029_5921859.shtml
Yu, Y. (2025). Risk prevention and practical exploration of AI-empowered ideological and political course teaching in universities. Journal of Langfang Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 41(2). (forthcoming)
Yue, Q., & Chen, M. Z. (2025). Coupled mechanisms, risk challenges, and ecological reconstruction of GenAI enabling ideological and political education. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Social Science Edition), 26(5), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.12186/2025.05.008
Zhong, H. (2025). The opportunities, challenges and countermeasures brought by the development of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer to person-targeted ideological and political education in colleges and universities. In Proceedings of the 2025 9th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2025) (p. 281). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-462-4_32
Zhong, Y., Huang, J., & Hu, H. (2026). The Teacher as Gatekeeper: Identifying and Governing Generative AI Risks in Chinese University Ideological and Political Courses. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(2), 579–595.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode