ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Radiation shielding is essential in protecting both patients and healthcare workers from unnecessary radiation exposure. Traditional lead-based materials, despite their proven efficacy in radiation shielding showed several disadvantages including heavy weight, toxicity, limited flexibility, and environmental hazards. In recent years, composite materials have emerged as alternatives to conventional shielding due to their lightweight properties, flexibility, and potential effectiveness in radiation attenuation (Gilys et al., 2022). With the introduction of composite materials as alternatives to traditional shielding these disadvantages were resolved. Due to its importance, it was necessary to understand how these materials are perceived and incorporated into practice and how efficient they are in clinical settings. This study explored the relationships among the perceived adequacy of composite materials, practices, and the efficiency of radiation shielding among radiologic technologists in selected hospitals in Bulacan. Recognizing the emergence of composite materials as alternatives to conventional shielding and the potential impact of their perception on practice and efficiency, this study aimed to provide practical recommendations for healthcare organizations. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected via a self-developed questionnaire and disseminated via Google Forms to 60 radiologic technologists in Bulacan using a stratified random sampling technique. Findings indicated that the respondents perceived composite materials as very adequate. The respondents fully practiced radiation shielding, especially during handling and maintenance, and were very efficient in radiation shielding. Statistical analysis revealed that perceived adequacy of composite materials had no significant influence on respondents’ shielding practices and the level of radiation shielding efficiency. On the other hand, storage and maintenance practices showed significant relationships with the efficiency in shielding consistency (r=0.627 and r=0.694) and the efficiency in application (r=0.379 and r=0.431). These results underscore that proper operational practices play a more critical role in the efficiency of using radiation shielding than material perception alone. The study concludes with recommendations for chief radiologic technologists and hospital administrators to develop protocols for the proper handling and storage of radiation shields and to support training opportunities for radiologic technologists in the use and maintenance of composite material shields.
Alhazmi, N. K., Alanazi, S. D., Alrowily, H. S. A., Alkhamsan, K. F., Al-Rashidi, F. A. D., Sultan, M. A.-S., Alanazi, M. K. A., & Alshammari, S. F. N. (2024). Radiation safety compliance and protective practices among radiologic technologists. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399431778_Radiation_Safety_Compliance_and_Protective_Practices_Among_Radiologic_Technologists
Alshamrani, A. F. A., Alrehily, F. A., Alqahtani, M. M., Gameraddin, M., Alharbi, M., Elmahdi, T. S. A., Alharbi, Z. A., Almutairi, T. Z., & Aljohani, O. A. (2026). Assessment of radiation safety awareness among nurses in nuclear medicine departments. PeerJ, 14, e21109. https://peerj.com/articles/21109/
Alsubaie, M. A., Abujamea, A. H., & et al. (2024). Knowledge and awareness of radiation exposure and safety practices among patients undergoing medical imaging. Cureus, 16(1),e52687. https://www.cureus.com/articles/221099-knowledge-and-perception-of-radiation-risk-from-computed-tomography-scans-among-patients-attending-an emergency-departm ent#!/
American Association of Physicists in Medicine. (2002). Quality control in diagnostic radiology (Report No. 74). https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/detail.asp?docid=73
American Dental Association. (2024, February 1). ADA releases updated recommendations to enhance radiography safety in dentistry. https://www.ada.org/about/press-releases/ada-releases-updated-recommendations-t o-enhance-radiography-safety-in-dentistry
Baek, K. N., & Kim, S. (2025). Usefulness of an additional shielding sheet for reducing radiation exposure to patients and medical staff during interventional radiology. Journal of Medical Physics, 50(4), 790–794. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_199_25
Benavides, E., Bhula, A., Gohel, A., et al. (2023). Patient shielding during dentomaxillofacial radiography: Recommendations from the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 154(9). https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(23)00391-4/fulltext
Ezugwu, W. K., Ibe, C. K., Ezenwaka, A., Ifeanyi, T. O., & Nwadike, U. I. (2025). A survey of the standard radiation protection practice in radiography departments of some-selected tertiary hospitals in South East Nigeria. Swiss Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 25(1), 1–17.https://sjoranm.com/sjoranm/article/view/91
Federico, L., Rolleto, A., Manzo, L., & et al. (2026). Survey on the use of patient contact shielding during radiological examinations: Variability in current clinical practice. Radiography. Advance online publication. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425003852
Gerasia, M., Federico L, V., Fiorella, G., & et al. (2025). Operational management of X-ray protective devices in radiology: An integrated practice protocol for integrity, functionality, and infection control. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41253659/
Hwang, J.-Y., Choi, Y. H., & Eo, H. (2025). The end of patient shielding: Rationale for discontinuing the practice. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 86. Advance online publication. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41415647/
International Atomic Energy Agency. (2014). Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3). https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/resources/international-safety-standards Interventional Radiology Study. (2024). Effectiveness of shielding positioning in reducing occupational exposure. Journal of Interventional Radiology.
Jalilifar, M., Fatahi-Asl, J., & Saba, V. (2022). Radiation protection to patients in radiology: A review study. Radioprotection, 57(1)41–48. https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/abs/2022/01/radiopro210024/radi opro210024.html
Khandaker, M. U., Abuzaid, M. M., Mohamed, I. A., Yousef, M., Jastaniah, S., Alshammari, Q. T., Alghamdi, S. S., Osman, H., Mohamed Ahmed, A., & Musa, A. (2023). Investigation of the Radiographer's adherence and compliance with radiation protection and infection control practices during COVID-19 mobile radiography. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 210, Article 111023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X23002682
Kim, S.-C., & Chon, K. S. (2025). Comparative theoretical and experimental validation of the shielding effectiveness of ceramic composite-based medical radiation protection tools. Ceramics, 8(4), 143. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8599467/
Kosik, R. O., Quek, S., Kan, E., Aoki, S., & et al. (2021). APQS consensus regarding patient shielding during routine radiographic imaging. The British Journal of Radiology, 94(1123) 20210252. https://academic.oup.com/bjr/article/94/1123/20210252/7455660?login=false
Larjava, H. R. S., Eneh, C. T. M., & Niiniviita, H. M. (2024). To shield or not to shield: Shielding may have unintended effects on patient dose in CT. European Radiology, 34(4), 2480–2486. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37707547/
Li, X.-P., Yao, H.-S., Zhao, Y., Yuan, B., Zhai, J., Li, L., Li, H., & Li, X. (2025). Polymer-based nuclear radiation shielding materials: State-of-the-art and emerging trends for engineering applications. Frontiers in Materials, 12, Article 1672938. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/materials/articles/10.3389/fmats.2025.1672938/ full
Lopez, R. (2024). Perceived adequacy and efficiency of radiation shielding application in clinical settings. Radiologic Science Journal.
Nagamoto, K., Yoshizuka, Kawano, S, & et al. (2024). Optimization of shielding placement for occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology. Radiation Measurements. Advance online publication. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39749070/
Ranada, R. T., Tilson, E., & Clark, K. (2024). Factors affecting gonadal shielding use among technologists in California. Radiologic Technology, 95(4), 263–270. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378846811_Factors_Affecting_Gonadal_Sh ielding_Use_Among_Technologists_in_California
Riley, P., Kidd, S., Power, J., Stegman, B., Dahle, T. (2025).Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Next-Generation Scatter Radiation Shielding Systems. Journal of Radiological Protection. Volume 4, Issue 8, August 2025, 103786. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325012281
Safari, A., Rafie, P., Taeb, S., Najafi, M., & Mortazavi, S. M. J. (2024). Development of lead-free materials for radiation shielding in medical settings: A review. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering, 14(3), 229–244. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39027711/
Schürmann, T., Lang, F., Jakobi, A., Rau, A., Weiss, J., Mueller-Peltzer, K., Goller-Bruchmann, K., Uller, W., Schlett, C. L., Bamberg, F., Fiebich, M., & Stein, T. (2025). Paradigm shift in the application of patient contact shielding: A balancing act between tradition and progress. European Radiology, 35(3), 1709–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12006-0
Shubayr, N. (2024). Factors influencing radiologic technologists’ commitment to radiation protective equipment utilization in fluoroscopy units: An analysis using the health belief model scale. Radioprotection, 59(2), 138–143. https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/full_html/2024/02/radiopro23010 0/radiopro230100.html
Stogiannos, N., Psimitis, A. (2023). Exploring radiographers’ perceptions and knowledge about patient lead shielding: A cross-sectional study in Greece and Cyprus. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 199(13), 1401–1409. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37415570/
Ragiles, H. R. P., & Sison, M. O. (2026). Perceived Adequacy in Composite Materials, Practice, and Efficiency in Radiation Shielding among Radiologic Technologists in Selected Hospitals in Bulacan. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(2), 1072-1093.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode